/lit/ - Literature

>>20707872
>warn students to use safe sex practices
Do you want a medal? Again, you ignore the most important part of the criticism: centering/over-amplifying (a politicized) sexual identity as character-defining, normalizing extreme sexual behaviour without linking them to extreme outcomes, and failing to emphasize individuals' emotional aspect of sex in favor of normalizing the idea of "fun." You don't protect against STDs and harm to mental health by paying lip service through false narratives.
>Well you criticized things that don’t actually exist
Gee, it's awfully convenient when an ideologue can just claim something doesn't exist instead of meeting the criticism head-on. What did I say that doesn't exist? Because...
>You made it up
Nope. There was a tranny grade school teacher in the US who had children choose their gender daily basis.
>The characterization of sex presented in a safe sex focused curriculum is as an intimate activity to be carefully considered as part of a partnered relationship, when a person feels emotionally ready for it.
Kek. Did you regurgitate that out of your official manual? See first point.
>I have no idea what religious gobbledygook you’d rather
You're the ideologue. Cool that you direct hate towards religion though. Again, that's for the colour show.
>Or are you really going to pretend
Again, ignoring that actual criticism and begging the question.
>Just for pubescent adolescents.
AKA children. Another trait of ideologues is the attempt to monopolize semantics to prevent criticism from reaching their ideological core and redefine such in their own terms so it can be dismissed instead of discussed. "THEY AREN'T KIDS! THEY'RE PREPUBESCENT ADOLESCENTS!" Listen to yourself for fuck's sake.
>I refuse to discuss your bizarre fantasies with you
A tranny refusing to discuss "bizarre fantasies." Oh, the irony!
>proportion of straight pedos to gay ones is 11:1. Should we draw the conclusion that straight men should never be left alone with children, given their clear propensity for child rape?
Again, homos are overrepresented as pedophiles. The population of homosexuals is much smaller than straight men. Statistically speaking, if I select a random straight man on the street he is far less likely to be a pedo than a random homosexual. That's the reality.
>This is why the biologist Milton Diamond
The guy who created and popularized your conceptualization of gender identity was a pedophilia advocate who forced a sexual reassignment surgery on a child who later killed himself. He also had children simulate sexual activities with one another and took photographs. In short, you're views on gender aren't based on fact and I'll repeat the same criticism again since you failed to meet it:
>gender norms evident in our closest animal cousins but you project your own theory-laden ideal in order to ignore these facts and amplify ambiguities (which are more subject to fringe theory and nebulous scaffolding).