/lit/ - Literature

>>8940646

>>8930123
> female authors

>>8911266

>This entire post

You're right. Hitler's concentration camps weren't responsible for millions of deaths. Rather, they were down to Zyklon-B and Typhus.

>>8892767

>>8890960

>Can you give me even one non trivial insight from picrelated that isn't some lol so deep unfalsifiable statement?

Why should that matter? Nietzsche didn't profess to be dealing in objective truth, nor necessarily even facts. He makes it perfectly clear that he is dealing with interpretation - just like everybody else, whether they want to admit it or not.

>It is clear that he is a Rorschach test for pseudo intellectuals.

Spoken like a true pseud.

Your whole attitude reeks of someone who longs for what Nietzsche himself called the 'Will to System' - you want your philosophy to be systematic, with everything clearly defined. In a way, you want it to be *mathematic* - arguments and claims presented in a formulaic
fashion, so that you can examine them in a black-and-white fashion to reach your binary conclusion: true or false.

Luckily for the rest of us, that's not what philosophy is about.

>>8862338

/lit/ is a /pol/ colony nowadays desu.

>>8854676
>'''''''''''''''''''''logical''''''''''''''''''''''''' thinking.

>>8813778

A lot of die-hard old-school Marxists are convinced that Zizek is actually a Reactionary/Fascist who hides behind Hegelian/Lacanian verbiage - particularly in light of that interview where he said he'd vote for Trump/etc.

In reality, he's one of the few Leftists/Marxists I can respect for his grasp of Realpolitik. 19th century Marxism will only get you so far in today's world. Rather than tailoring modernity to Marxism, as many people do, Zizek actually tailors Marxism to modernity - hence why people get mad at him for admitting that some sort of violent worker's revolution just isn't possible in today's world.

They also REALLY don't get his conception of 'violence' and accelerationism in general.

>>8763891

I don't think there's any hidden meaning in your dream. As >>8764004 said, just because a dream is clear doesn't mean it is important.

At a stretch, it might mean 2 things:

1) You're lusting after someone who isn't really returning the favour. They're only giving into your advances after a disproportionate amount of effort, and perhaps only reluctantly.

2) You're pursuing this person into uncomfortable/unusual situations.

>female
>author

>>8741199
>*recurrs behind you eternally*

>Monotheism

>>8723317
>Hegelianism is presuppositionless kiddo. Read the science of logic.

Entropy presupposes a systematic universe.

>>8592636
>>8593439

>>8531982

Well then what happens if you're just some hippy parent who lets their kids do whatever they want? Buys them condoms for when they're fucking around, etc. Do they grow up to become strict conservatives?

I doubt it. Sounds like a lose-lose to me, desu.

May as well hedge your bets and be a strict parent, or at least moderately strict.

>feudalism lasted 600 years
>capitalism began at the earliest in 1750, 260 years ago
>"late" capitalism

>>8497460
>Hell

>>8493092
>Fair enough, they're fighting the good fight on the front lines.
>a horde of manchildren living on the internet making careers of calling people "cucks" is anon's idea of "fighting the good fight on the front lines"
>anon is so fucking stupid he thinks the west isn't 100% controlled by the right

>>8439456
>*grinds lens Jewishly*

>>8429005
>in order to compensate for my lack of good looks.

Yeah, and I'm sure it helps.

>>8414406

7lbs a day.

No wonder he was up all night vomiting/etc.

>>8398905
>did that guy just use impact as a verb?