/lit/ - Literature

>>11581954
read Guénon instead, but it sounds like you dont like esotericism

>>11463178
>Notice how Ebola being in a wheelchair and being rebuked by most tradfags is not dealt with.

>>11393319
Trash. Read Guenon instead.

>>11379467
>following other than (insert preferred religion) is running away or nihilism

please anon

>>11367609
>>11367595
>. One can deduce that modern man, especially North American man, has regressed to primitivism in choosing, assimilating, and developing a music of such primitive qualities as Negro music, which was even originally associated with dark forms of ecstasy.

>>11365903
Guenon is actually right most of the time. The only times I've seen Guenon be wrong is with stuff later proven by science decades later but which was unclear at the time. With Evola I see basic mistakes that wouldn't have happened if he had read the primary sources.

>>11366343
Evola claimed Buddhism was aristocratic and elitist while it was really the revolutionary and anti-hierarchical teaching of it's time that undermined traditional social structures. He also wrote that Advaita Vedanta was a Dravidian/non-Aryan development away from the Vedic tradition that led to hedonistic nihilism, when in fact non-dualism is found all throughout the Vedas, Vedanta is pro-hierarchy and tradition through extolling the caste system, and it strictly teaches that lust and craving are bad and to be abandoned.

If he could get such basic premises as these wrong, it doesn't make me trust that he got much else correct.

>>11266632

>>11127820
>No Evola is better than Guenon, having a spine is better than being a long faced dilettante

Do you mean the spine shattered by an Allied bomb when he walked around during a bombing raid like retard?

>>11115086
>>11115149

>>11086023

>>11077660
for you

>>11054106

>>10999226
I like Evola but this image gets me everytime

/lit/ humour thread

>>10703665

>>10660874