/lit/ - Literature

>>16206831
woaaahhhhh he made le epic topical reference!!!!!

>>15538778
YEAH, RAMMING YOUR COCK IN AND OUT OF HIS STINKY SHITHOLE IS SO INTIMATE BRO!

>NOOOOO YOU CAN'T JUST HANG A CHILD THROAT SLITTER, YOU HAVE TO GIVE THEM A FAIR TRIAL THEN GIVE THEM A PLACE TO SLEEP AND FREE FOOD FOR THE REST OF THEIR LIVES IF THEY DON'T GET OFF ON SOME THROAT-SLITTER TECHNICALITY!!!!
>NOOOOO YOU HAVE FOLLOW THE COMMON LAW!!!

>>15404150
>WOOOOOAH NO WAAAAY THIS GREASY EUROPEAN SAID ENGLISH BAD!!!!!! HE'S SO CULTURED!!!!!

>oh I guess I forget that only thing they can use for 'argument' is image memes and banalities like "cringe" or "yikes"

>I believe phoneposting killed this fucking board. How on a thread specifically asking for genuine discussion did none of you manage to give a thought out substantive reply? No analysis on the contents or arguments of the book, no explanation of why the author is wrong and what is the correct way of viewing it, just stupid retards with stupid retarded laconic comments saying nothing. Fuck you all honestly don’t ever reply to my thread again. /lit/ needs to introduce a system which allows for OP’s to set a minimum word count for responses, so that you can be sure to filter out all phoneposting cunts.