[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:

View post   
>> No.11595692 [View]
File: 72 KB, 360x600, wittgenpickupline.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11595692

Wittgenstein ended philosophy. Prove me wrong. (((you can not)))

>> No.11397607 [View]
File: 72 KB, 360x600, 1469903500219.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11397607

Would Wewgenstein post on /lit/?

>> No.10180606 [View]
File: 72 KB, 360x600, 1469903500219.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10180606

>>10180538

thx 4 the laff OP

>> No.9797740 [View]
File: 72 KB, 360x600, 1469903500219.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9797740

>>9795078
>http://www.online-literature.com/tolstoy/2738/

Apparently Wewgenstein had a hard on for this short story.

>> No.9561604 [View]
File: 72 KB, 360x600, 1469903500219.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9561604

>>9561370

>implying that lass didnt make a neutral statement
>implying that phrase can be perceived positively or negatively
>implying you choose the negative due to poor self image
>implying she didnt give you a complement

way to drop the ball lad, now pick it up

>> No.24335 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 72 KB, 360x600, Wittgenstein.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

OH FUCK OH FUCK OH FUCK
I MISSED IT. CAN /fitlit/ stay plox??
Quick give me the accumulated knowledge of /fitlit/

>> No.9092900 [View]
File: 72 KB, 360x600, 1469903500219.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9092900

>muh words

>> No.8339412 [View]
File: 72 KB, 360x600, Wittgenstein.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8339412

>tfw too stupid for smart books

>> No.8331501 [View]
File: 72 KB, 360x600, 1455011991294.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8331501

>> No.8059635 [View]
File: 72 KB, 360x600, 1362331866803.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8059635

>>8059543
Can't believe I finally got to use this meme

>> No.7821781 [View]
File: 72 KB, 360x600, 1455011991294.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7821781

>> No.7783422 [View]
File: 72 KB, 360x600, 1456366638829.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7783422

someone in a college fiction workshop gave me shit for using a justified alignment. is it that bad? should i not do it? my professor didn't mention it

>> No.7280314 [View]
File: 72 KB, 360x600, 1440668484177.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7280314

>>7277453
Wittgenstein´s Tractatus maybe

>> No.7239822 [View]
File: 72 KB, 360x600, 1387219761745.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7239822

>>7239765

bump for interest

>> No.7235951 [View]
File: 62 KB, 360x600, kiKABtV.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7235951

>>7235590
TLP leads the way to PI leads the way to enlightenment

>> No.7035273 [View]
File: 72 KB, 360x600, swagtatus.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7035273

>>7034755

>> No.6761404 [View]
File: 62 KB, 360x600, got.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6761404

>>6761387
#TYBW

>> No.6609869 [View]
File: 72 KB, 360x600, witt.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6609869

Witty always relevant.

>> No.6400153 [View]
File: 72 KB, 360x600, 1426739283649.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6400153

>>6400133

And your point is?

>> No.6288369 [View]
File: 72 KB, 360x600, sexyandwitty.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6288369

>> No.5308667 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 72 KB, 360x600, how to logically pick up chicks.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5308667

Does anyone know of any agreed upon sectioning to Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations? Starting my second read of it and I want a more systematic/structured read this time (however antithetical that is to him and his later work). I've only ever seen one that sections off 1-138 for his discussion of language games and 139-242 for his rule following stuff. After that no one seems to have any idea (that I can find).

I saw on sparknotes that they have a bunch of divisions for it but that seems more like a division based on number of sections as opposed to topical.

>> No.4983815 [View]
File: 72 KB, 360x600, 1396108412280.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4983815

>>4983027
No they're nonsensical (unsinnig) propositions.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]