/lit/ - Literature

I love you

Love you guys alot
hope you are in high spirits and having a beautiful day <3

I just want to love you and hold you tight. For tonight or the rest of your life. I have love for you if you’de like

I love you

Love is just a word until someone comes along and gives it meaning.

Oh literature! Muse of muses, I love you. I will love you forever. Where are you? You’ve been gone too long. It hurts me so much. This sadness paralyzes me, asphyxiates me. Kicking and squirming please I am stuck on the shell of my back. Turn me on and over. Help me itch toward and crawl on over your pages. Stay open, I will be crushed within that book closed. See my spin of reticula, words around your impression against me, may never leave this embrace. So that you may never know what I’ve felt since you’ve disappeared. Grant this your signs. Grant I dont only if for granted you forever took this. Oh literature, I sing your name in the downtowns metro bathroom stall of the Internet, amoungst the haunted graffiti of zero’s and ones, because I do. Come closer

Books on Love

(more Empedocles and less Freud)

Man was cast out of Heaven for not respecting Gods boundaries. Is it me or does Man in general have a hard time respecting boundaries (i.e. war, assault, etc) and what’s more, blaming women for this. It was man who wrote the story, an incredible story (e.g. “it was a snake, and he already tricked her, and she already did it so I had to you see”) Are there any books Man can learn to respect other people’s boundaries and learn to live in Peace and finally bring the kingdom of heaven to earth?

>>13151932
TO GIVE HER THE GREATEST ORGASM SHES EVER HAD

(1/2)
There’s a part in Euthyphro where Socrates starts talking the difference between carrying and being carried, leading and being led, seeing and being seen and asks Euthyphro if he knew where the difference lies and Euthyphro says “I think I understand”. I certainly didn’t have a clue what the fuck Socrates was on about so I wrote it out and I got this; one is to do, the other is being done to. “And is not that which is beloved distinct from that which loves?” ask Socrates. “Certainly” Euthyphro says. Socrates goes on “Well; and now tell me, is that which is carried in this state of carrying because it is carried, or for some other reason?” What Socrates is saying here is that there is a difference between a thing being, and the state in which it is being. What’s more, that “a thing is not seen because it is visible, but visible because it is seen” as in the being comes first than the state it’s in. “Nor is a thing led because it is in a state of being led” the point being, the state follows the act. There is a primacy in being, that being causes form. The state something is in is a result and not the cause i.e. the form it’s in is a result of its being and not the reverse. “The state of being loved follows the act of being loved, and not the act the state.” The state follows the act. Now if your familiar with the dialogue you know it’s Socrates drawing out the contradiction of Euthyphros definition of piety, what is dear and loved by the Gods.

The Sophist, Parmenides, and Euthyphro

Anyone else interested in the dialectical magic deliberately buried by master Plato. I keep trying to find a serious thread about the elevator teachings but I really think Plato and Hegel are the only ones who really knew and tried to bring it to the public. I get the feeling Derrida knows but I haven’t seriously touched his work yet