/lit/ - Literature

>>19159508
No, he would have looked Semitic. Modern Palestinians have huge amounts of Greek DNA due to Greek colonization. Jesus had none. We know because we're told his lineage. To argue that he was partially Greek, as you are doing, is not only to suggest that the Bible was wrong, but it is to suggest that he was not the Jewish Messiah and did not fulfill the Old Testament prophesies which require him to be an ethnic Jew.

This would mean that he would have looked like what a pure Jew, without Greek influence, looks like. And that's pic related. If you want to engage in heresy, feel free to, but you are, by your own admission, openly rejecting the Christian tradition deriving from Jesus himself.

>>15982469
>Ashkenazi Jews are Jews in their natural state
No, Ashkenazim are about 30-70% European, depending on the population (the remaining 30-70% is Semite, the Khazar theory has been debunked). The Mizrahim, who are totally unmixed with Arabs, demonstrated this.

>b-b-but they're brown!
Well... Yeah? That's what Semites ARE. Semites are brown. The difference between Jews and Arabs is minuscule. We're talking "Danes and Swedes" minuscule.

>b-b-but Taleb!
Taleb is like 3/4ths Greek, dude. Yes, many Semitic populations were Hellenized, culturally and genetically. The Jews were not one of them. DNA studies confirm this.