[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.21375241 [View]
File: 18 KB, 460x366, 129011952431.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21375241

>>21375222
>>21375234

>> No.17402819 [View]
File: 19 KB, 460x366, FireBrainlet.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17402819

>>17402424
>>17402244
>>17402451
>>17402478
> Incel duur hab segs

>> No.17330824 [View]
File: 19 KB, 460x366, FireBrainlet.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17330824

>>17328335
> I'm no antinatalist
> I only believe in literally the whole premise of antinatalism

PS: Antinatalism is a retarded ideology for midwits and pseuds refuted to hell and back by a combination of:

1. Notorious objections to hedonism, and thus utilitarianism, negative or not, as a whole (Utility Monster, Pleasure Machine, Experience Machine);
2. Depression rates are at an all time high in 1st world countries despite our higher living standards, especially compared to starving 3rd world countries, further refuting hedonism;
3. Even with depression at an all time high, the vast majority of people are not suicidal (In the sense that they do not desire suicide, not that most are impeded by survival instinct alone, for survival instinct is overcome eventually by one who is truly convicted to abandoning this life) and would not choose to "not have existed", refuting the conception that suffering renders life insurmountably terrible;
4. The vast majority of individuals can find meaning and positive value in their lives, in combination with the arbitrary and purely hedonistic nature of Benatard's asymmetry, in of itself, it is refuted;
5. Antinatalists are huge faggots as demonstrated by OP (refer to >>17329238 and take note from >>17328391), and need to go back to plebbit;

>> No.15489526 [View]
File: 19 KB, 460x366, 1590450971866.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15489526

>the reddit man said so

his argument is that you can't tell what's happening in the text, which is just plain wrong. You don't even need annotations for that. It's fun to read without "getting" the allusions and you can gather the meaning of most from context. Also, Nietzsche threw that notion he quotes out of the window with Zarathustra which is both deep and obscure.

>> No.15452166 [View]
File: 19 KB, 460x366, 1590412164342.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15452166

>>15451937

>> No.15447699 [View]
File: 19 KB, 460x366, brainlet-campfire-brain.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15447699

>>15447637
>Acting like you know a goddamn thing about books when you read harry potter is like walking into a boxing gym like you're hot shit after you spent 3 months training karate in the strip mall in your jammies

>To be a reader you have to strictly read thinks intellectual, though-provoking, and analytical.
>Light-hearted reading on the side is strictly prohibited.
>I'm anon and I browse /lit/ with a track record of 4 books under my belt but I want to feel smart.

>> No.14393846 [View]
File: 19 KB, 460x366, brainlet_brain_fire.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14393846

>>14393839
>literally whos

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]