/lit/ - Literature

>>20645825
>Evola

>Author didn't commit suicide

>>10653666 (checked)
>>10654129
The state of (You)
>>10654133
No, OP is off about a few things.
OP assumes there is no afterlife and then immediately makes an argument against the benevolence of God instead of disowning His existence, and instead says he shouldn't be worshipped, which is the surest route to damnation. This lack of consistency makes the rest of his "rational" posturing seem completely disingenuous as a result. Like >>10653966 (checked) said before, there should be no confusion as to where suicide stands on the judgement table, if you are religious then you know that it lies with all other sins and shouldn't be practiced in the same way that murder and theft shouldn't be practiced.
OP uploaded a quote that holds the opposite implication to his own argument, which is to seek death rather than discard it from thought.
OP wants you to believe he's made a valid argument that your loved ones will come to agree with even when no such argument has been made.
But the most obvious problem I have is that OP hasn't killed himself already and is instead making these unintelligent, non-/lit/ related threads.