[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:

View post   
>> No.7003915 [View]
File: 70 KB, 387x386, sagan_uc.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7003915

>>7003905
>that theory solely belonged to Freud

>> No.4378817 [View]
File: 70 KB, 387x386, sagan_uc.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4378817

>>4378783
>"Is this how you use soap?"

>> No.3712456 [View]
File: 70 KB, 387x386, 1.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3712456

>>3710859
>Even the simplest thought like the concept of the number one has an elaborate logical underpinning.

>> No.3570762 [View]
File: 70 KB, 387x386, sagan_uc.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3570762

>>3570752
>not trying to make a point
>"hurrrr that's what X actually believes"

That's not how it works son.

>> No.2955744 [View]
File: 70 KB, 387x386, sagan_uc.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2955744

>>2955574
>/sci/
>liking Ayn Rand

"And so Anon proved he was neither a scientist nor an engineer but probably just some first semester economy/law student. The End!"

Honestly though...
If you're looking for objectivism scientific faculties are CERTAIN-FUCKING-LY the wrong place. And I should probably know as I've been there for some time now.
It just lacks the kindness, understanding and most of all cooperation that should be (and mostly is) common in science and engineering.
Selfishness has absolutely no place there (and gets you fired in companies by the way).

You must be fucking insane if you think scientists or any technical/scientific discipline would foster or live the ideas of Rand, a second-rate philosopher.

>> No.2178703 [View]
File: 70 KB, 387x386, RichardDawkins.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

The God Delusion and God Is Not Great.
>that feel when you realise that God isn't real and that there's nothing after death. pretty depressing imo.

>> No.1891824 [View]
File: 70 KB, 387x386, 068905.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1891824

>>1891819
>>1891819

naw that's not too bad, the stupid thing is the parameters he sets for reading, no pre-ww2, no women authors.

and his views on sex are hilarious
he doesn't care if he comes in less than a minute because he's had sex and that's all that's important to him

mfw capsguy leaves the ugly japanese girls disappointed

>> No.1527111 [View]
File: 70 KB, 387x386, 1729273927349.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1527111

>>1527097
>Non-Utilitarian morality

>> No.1416894 [View]
File: 70 KB, 387x386, sagan_uc.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1416894

>>1416882

Harry Potter. Billions and billions of them.

>> No.1285421 [View]
File: 70 KB, 387x386, sagan_uc.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1285421

>>1285415
>>1285417

Ok then, new question.

Which is the LEAST shitty?

>> No.1201514 [View]
File: 70 KB, 387x386, sagan_uc.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1201514

What's the minimum age for comprehension for the greatest work you've read?

I'm trying to decide what age is appropriate to introduce my child to The Wheel of Time.

>> No.1127550 [View]
File: 70 KB, 387x386, carl_sagan.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1127550

subject says all i want your opinion im getting one for sure but not sure which

>> No.960081 [View]
File: 70 KB, 387x386, carl_sagan.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
960081

Dragons of Eden by Carl Sagan.

It will blow your fucking mind.

>> No.836347 [View]
File: 70 KB, 387x386, carl_sagan.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
836347

>>836339
>And you are Sagan

lol wut

>> No.763495 [View]
File: 70 KB, 387x386, sagan_uc.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
763495

>>763480
>billions
>billions
>billions

>> No.736230 [View]
File: 70 KB, 387x386, CarlSagan1.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
736230

>>736196

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]