/lit/ - Literature

>>11469316
Peterson almost never condemn postmodernism or Marxism methodically, but always morally which is far easier to do. When he talks about Marxism, he never talks about Western-European Marxism, but always Eastern-European Marxim, and then speaks about things such as the working camps and famines in the USSR. When talking about posmodernism, it's never about the methods, but what he comprehends as the faulty morals of Foucault who he paints as a bitter and depresed man trying to destroy the world around him out of his own chaos.
When talking about the postmodernism literature, Peterson attacks the literature for their perceived ideological inclination instead of methodically, but then creates this perception of ideological inclination by reading and agreeing with books that do agree with his ideological inclinations. Peterson, for example, draws his beliefs on postmodernism from Hicks, who refuses to argue against postmodernism by analyzing it on its own terms, and calls postmodernism a socialist ploy for immigration, this is a secondary source, and an incredibly colored one at that.