[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.21874785 [View]
File: 271 KB, 1145x835, 1649795180209.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21874785

>>21874772
>/lit/ is the board richest in actual biological females

>> No.21578566 [View]
File: 271 KB, 1145x835, 1649795180209.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21578566

The answer to the book is that he claims to have a rational and logical argument throughout the entire book about how the suffering of life is outweighed by the pleasures of life, but he fails to accept the logical conclusion to this: Suicide. If it is true that life is pure suffering and the moments of sparse goodness are not worth all the suffering, then suicide and mass murder becomes *ethical things to do*.

And since he *doesn't* think suicide and mass murder are good things, this means he actually doesn't believe in the logical conclusion to his own arguments. QED: His book sucks.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]