/lit/ - Literature

>>16222384
t.

>>11396474
what does a copywriter do?

I’m not a /pol/-tard but If it’s socially acceptable to talk about the disproportionate influence white men have in society, and how our history textbooks and humanities curriculums are only filled with “dead white men”, and how white men have built up a system to keep themselves in power and “other” everyone else, then it’s biased to immediately discount all talks of “disproportionate Jewish influence” in certain spheres. Loxism is just as real as white supremacist beliefs, anyone can be xenophobic and racist and clique-like. I support free speech on all sides. A certain cabal is hugely powerful and loud in the mainstream culture of the West which says, “White heterosexual Christian men (or some combination of these traits) have been oppressors for a long time throughout historically and benefit from many privileges due to a system they’ve perpetuated to keep themselves in power and benefit themselves, and, therefore, any other group outside these norms is justified in forming cliques and furthering its own interests and discriminating against white heterosexual Christian men.” This is basically just making a new prejudice instead of eliminating prejudice.

Because this is a book and therefore literature, even if it’s in an online format, I therefore must stand in support of discussion of it.

Is /lit/ the most retarded board on 4chan?

>>10925100