/lit/ - Literature

>>17444172
>MONEY MONEY MONEY
I assume you are on the wrong board? anyway kill yourself mindless ape

>>17128857
>oh boy

>>16325310
>Wut? They still pop out more than one babies apiece on average even in the West.
>That's the demographic transition, get over it bitch, we're already numerous enough. Or do you need us to be a trillion on Earth so that each of us can be a thousand times more insignificant that he already is?
>Besides, what are you regretting? The days of daddy and mommy tilling the field while your three elder brothers are dying of polio and you're send away to a malnourished nurse to be miserably breastfed until you die of hunger at 10 months?
>The common answer to "I wish I was born 300 years ago" is "if you'd been born 300 years ago you'd be a peasant" but even that is too optimistic. If you'd been born 300 years ago you would most likely have died before reaching age 10.

>>15566193
Holy f*cking bugman.

>>15444181
Slurping that sweet, sweet söy milk, my dear /pol/tard.

>>15284357
Söy overdose.

>>15255517
>The central flaw behind Western civilization is the creator/creation dichotomy which is associated with substance metaphysics and the idea of thing-in-itselfness, that something only needs itself to exist, removed from anything else. This is the philosophical justification for private property, which requires dismissing parallelism and focusing only on linear causality. Substance metaphysics is the metaphysics of alienation, and one possible route to transcend this is process metaphysics, in which thing-ness is the total web of relationships between an event and everything else. In this view there is no distinction between a creator and a creation, and the concept of a singular creator creating a singular creation is replaced by an immanent creativity in which all events co-author the tapestry of existence.
>The perception of reality that comes with this is all of existence as continually co-creating art, of not a singular purpose and meaning but an infinite number of them, a universe alive with unfathomable richness and depth of meaning that while we can only glimpse a small fraction of, such glimpses give a hint of the hidden vastness that while unreachable to us, can be experienced. Try to imagine your life as a relationship with the universe, not in a paternalistic sense or a dominative sense (as with the idea that the universe is a passive, meaningless void upon which one creates meaning out of,) but in a mutualistic sense of complete equality. Remember that this isn't a relationship between yourself and a singular unity, but a web of relationships of which the totality comprises your life, including your relationship with yourself. Seek mutualistic co-creative relationships in all affairs, not just between humans but all things, including elements of yourself, and you will find well-being and happiness.
>Your afterlife is literally what happens after your life: there is no distinction between you and the rest of the universe, and so your becoming is truly immortal; you live on as the universe. Those who place all meaning in their own existence have their meaning die with them, but those who place their meaning in all that is outside them have immortal meaning.

>>15251707
>I use G for general notes, Q for quotes, L for lexicon, R for references, C for characters, ! for extraordinary/enlightening stuff.

>Verso Books

Anyone else have a large catalogue of fantastic ideas but lack the writing skills to execute it to your liking?

How do you get around this? Is it just a matter of try and try again?