/lit/ - Literature

>>13573549
>On what basis?
>Marx
His utopia would ultimatly led to enforced egality. He may say he do not believe in that, but he's just lying.

>Derrida and Foucault
Self-admitted nonsensical philosophers, you can read whatever you want from them. Most /lit/ comments about their works seems to give reason to Peterson too.

>The fact that he goes up and gives lectures on these writers is nothing but charlatanism.
He talks about them in his lectures, I don't think he ever dedicated entire lectures to them (well maybe Heidegger but as I said, I don't care about him).

>Giving lectures on topics you know nothing about is the work of a charlatan.
But then again, he mostly talk about what he knows about so who cares? His reading of modern social activists are certainly right.