/lit/ - Literature

>>22908284
If it "exists in itself" then do you still seriously believe that you experience it as it is in itself? Either just accept that you are a crypto kantian or have fun with skepticism (assuming you are capable if critical thinking that is).

>>22542943
>no Berkeley
ngmi
>>22544454
All of that still happens within your own conscious experience. Shifts in consciousness happen all the time. If something goes wrong in the mental organization, it can be referred to as "brain damage"
Matter just complicates things, its a metaphysical abstraction and, well, then we get into cartesian skepticism

By going back to basics

>>22324288
Evidently you haven't read his actual philosophical works and only his childish political fantasies.
Pic rel tore him open a new one on that front.