/lit/ - Literature

>>19854428
I can understand why a muslim 100% indoctrinated by Islam and committed to believing their religion is the definition of virtue might think that way, but I will not. I know for a fact that children are still children even in the year 621, and that having intercourse with one to "admit them to your house" at that age is nothing but pedophilia and exploitation that serves zero purpose other than to satisfy lust.

There is no standard metric, the ones we have are all arbitrary cutoff points to make sure you're not fucking a child who are not aware of the consequences of their actions or understand the intimate nature of the act. Though that doesn't mean there isn't a certain age range that is mentally mature and biologically ready, objectively speaking.

>>19855610
What makes you compare a divine figure in Islam and the "role model for all muslims" to what commoners in Europe did at that time? Aren't the laws and commandments of Allah timeless? I don't really care about marriage, but exploiting the body of a child is completely off-putting to me.

>>15679072
This is my own take on the Parmenidean subject matter:

>"Parmesan is dead"

Premises:
>(1.) Predication uses the existential verb 'is'
>(2.) Predication necessitates the existence of the state described
>(3.) Predication makes the subject (of a sentence) understandable in the sense being predicated -- eg.: Parmenides is senseless for himself, but is made sense of as dead in the statement "Parmenides is dead"
>(4.) Thought requires the object of thought to make sense

Deductions:
>(ded1.) Sense is the prerequisite of thought
>(ded2.) Predication is what makes sense
>(ded3.) Predication necessitates existence
>(ded4.) Thought necessitates predication

Conclusion:
>"Being and thought are one and the same"

>>13012243
>tfw your life is literally someones worst nightmare but your used to it.