/lit/ - Literature

>>6646896
Are you a retard or a just an anarchist?

What's the difference anyways?

>>6491939
David Harvey, Micheal Roberts, Simon Clarke, Noam Chomsky, Slavoj Zizek, Richard D. Wolff etc etc do very heavy analysis work but don't really provide any solutions or "what needs to be done".

The problem with "on the ground, what needs to be done!" like stuff Lenin wrote for the Russian Revolution is that most of the far-left community these days likes to sit in it's echo-chambers, half-heartedly engage in slactivism and then circlejerk. One only needs to look at how successful Anarcho-Capitalism and Right wing Liberalism has become online in a matter of years with it's culture wars, while all places like /r/socialism, /r/communism, LibCom, Revleft do is sit in their echo chambers whining and then ban anybody who isn't in their eyes 110% ideologically pure. (One only needs to look at the huge purges on /r/socialism by their zealot utopian mods of anybody that disagrees with them on any issue)

What may be even worse is actually the real world first world activism from Socialists. There is a reason Trotskyists are the single most hated organization in all of activism, all they do is enter other peoples protests and then try hijack them and the message, often very aggressively.

It's like how the saying goes, if you want the best argument against Socialism, spend time with Socialists.

The first world left has stagnated and largely just become a complete and utter circlejerk of retards playing historical reenactment society and fantasizing about being the next Che Guevara.