/lit/ - Literature

>>23358479
>You supposedly fought to preserve your culture
What? Britain fought because Germany started a war where it wanted to conquer its neighbors, including Britain and its allies. That's just simple self-defense. And culture was going to fluctuate regardless. You think the average Bong today is a spitting average of a Bong in Churchill's England? Or that those Bongs are spitting images of Queen Victoria's England? Or that THOSE Bongs are spitting images of King George III's England, etc? In another century or so, future Bongs will look back on the early 21st century as a "better time" as people always do when looking at their ancestors' past, specifically because they never lived in it.

The point I'm getting at with both these posts is that world domination by any one culture is retarded and will eventually pan out badly for all parties involved, including the conquerors themselves. Germany would eventually be the biggest multicultural shithole in Europe had it won, and all the Germans in that timeline are probably spitting on the first Furher's grave for all the reparations and gibs they have to pay out to all the Jews, Bongs, Slavs, Meds, Nords, Frenchmen, and gypsies whose ancestors they oppressed or massacred.