/lit/ - Literature

>>19907662
Lol, you are an anglo with a minuscule understanding of Marx, probably from outdated thinkers or outright counter-revolutionaries. You also haven't read anti-tech rev.
You also fail to address the current critique of value, and why the revolutionary inheritors of Marx are anti-industrial.
You also post cartoon pictures LMAO

>>19907787
The Amish have nothing to do with Kaczynski's strategy. Read more.

>>19759958
You are an extension of the machine - crude but more or less correct. Basic materialism. It is not surprising that only the idealist interpretation of technology leads to such broken conclusions (Heidegger, McLuhan)

>>19761430
Kaczynski has nothing to do with "trad values". That a bunch of protestants distort everything through the prism of moralism does not affect his writings in any way. The anti-industrial movement is mainly made up of post-situ and "green" anarchists. You are only displaying your own ignorance here.

>>19721156
This is not a quote by Kaczynski, a quick google search shows that it's from "Juenger Friedrich Georg -The_Failure_of_Technology "

Kaczynski cannot be "pushed as an op" to distract from coherent anticapitalist ideas because 1. The destruction of industrial society is fundamentally deleterious to capital
2. it is in fact the latest, most coherent iteration of political materialism as vindicated by the *actual* radical & autonomous revolutionary forces in the world whose works converge towards anti-industrialism.
3. Marx is a genius, quite systematic and rigorous; yet, the latest developments in the realm of materialism have invalidated an important portion of his works. It is not a matter of whether or not you dislike Kaczynski, or any other radical materialist, but a matter of aligning one's self to the current developments of materialism.

>>19629410
Correct. Rightoids produce memes of kaczynski while radical leftist edit him, translate him, discuss his works, spread his ideas, set up websites to host his publications and correspondences etc..

>>19453437
>hyper-online people and pseuds
:^)

>>19248261
/thread

The current crisis had the benefit of evicting every idealist, romantic, comedians, cynics, nihillists and other pathological types. The focus is on praxis now.

>>19240075
Read anti-tech revolution if you are not some diminished urbanite larper who entertains the possibility of a tech collapse as a mere coping mechanism to alleviate his own psychological turbulences instead of redirecting his productive forces and brainpower towards actually, concretely changing the material conditions of today.

>>19055840
in an anarchist society we hang chomsky on the first day faggot

>>18923794
The CIA doesn't influence culture in a way that the will of its leaders happen to shape the course of history - that's idealistic

That the CIA and other post WW2 institutions organized themselves in a cybernetic fashion in order to produce and reproduce capital is the closest you can get to an understanding of our current state of affairs.

There are barely any books talking about this in an ordered, academic way since the authors are all turbo mega anarchists of the highest order and don't care about publications, mostly.

L'encyclopédie des nuisances, Ted Kaczynski, french anarchist sociology and situationism

Read them