/lit/ - Literature

>>13907635
But "objects" are the new subjects to evolution and how would retards help in that aspect, protecting the weak is still degeneration.
It looks like the only reason to actually protect the weak is to cause an increase on the amount of choices that will reinforce the binary status of our social structure so that retards like us can make choices and feel like they define themselves through them, proving to be superior to others and feel good with themselves even for a little bit. It is a fucking endless trip.
Weak or strong doesn't matter, just delete the human specie as a whole.

My textbook and a paper uses uses a source within a source that I want to use. So my sentences are like this.

1) If my hypothesis is correct it would mirror the research of Brown (2007) which found _________as cited in (Jackson, 2014 (m textbook).

Sentence two: Source within a source (research article)

As mentioned in Blair, et al (2009) it is asserted that__________ (Schreier, et al., 2010)

Help please I need to send this in by 8pm

Hey guys, I am currently reading Pascal and am trying to understand this passage more clearly I simply don't get it.

"The only thing which consoles us for our miseries is diversion, and yet this is the greatest of our miseries. For it is this which principally hinders us from reflecting upon ourselves, and which makes us insensibly ruin ourselves. Without this we should be in a state of weariness and this weariness would spur us to seek a more solid means of escaping from it. But diversion amuses us, and leads us unconsciously to death."

>>8463211
Cheers, based Anon.