[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.18658537 [View]
File: 1.64 MB, 2388x1718, 2w4t5eghhpl21.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18658537

>>18658127
>>18658135
>>18658135
Unless your book is as incomprehensible and surreal as the illustration itself, I'd say they did a shit job. I struggle to recognize a single thing in it aside from some weird two-walled buildings. If that's just his style, not sure why you asked that guy in particular. I will be honest and admit that this sort of art isn't really my thing, I prefer my stuff far more representational, but I try to critique art by consistent standards.

For my criticism of the piece itself, there's very little thought put into composition, specifically in the values. The whole image is more or less evenly valued, no contrast. What I assume to be the focal point of the piece, the top left shape that could be interpreted as some black beast if I look at it hard enough, is completely drowned out by the shapes around it. If the rest of the piece was just a little bit darker, it would have read much better. Color also would have made it significantly easier to look at.

It's not a bad piece per se. It's got a lot of soul, but I'm not getting any clue of what your book is about other than a general vibe.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]