/lit/ - Literature

>>18620528
Tam is a different type of so. It should be "ut". Also obliviscor is deponent and takes genitive objects...not suitable for a passive construction like this, because when you say
>historia non oblita sit
people will understand it as
>may history not have forgotten (something)
as in history itself is the one forgetting something.

Therefore we will use the verb oblittero, which is regular and has an excellent connotation and etymology in this context anyway.
>ut historia non oblitteraretur
This is using the imperfect. The correct tense may need to be adjusted depending on the context.