/lit/ - Literature

>>11195117
sounds like you are alone in your conviction
>>11195122
nope that’s not your explanation that’s someone else trying to explain it. weird how this is so difficult for hegelfags. don’t see this in most other continental threads. even deleuzefag explained BwO to me patiently for hours without complaining
>>11195171
this >>11195176 isn’t me.
>you can’t assume a negation without knowing its antipode
no that’s assinine i can know not-x without ever knowing x because not-x is a negation which all humans can intuit by having experienced them near constantly while thinking incorrectly or ascertaining lies or inconsistencies.
>we are the absolute
we’re finite beings not the absolute
>as process
then its not the absolute its the germ-absolute
>if thought can think its outside
you mean a negation? no one is thinking its just a negation its the opposite of thinking. god is such a hollow idea all it yields is a negation which is worthless for further considerations.
>appropriation of the Outside
i think i know what you mean, i disagree, but what do you actually mean? notice how you couldn’t go two sentences without soliloquizing in your little personal spook resonance chamber?

so, again anons:

WHAT IS THE DIALECTIC, HOW DOES IT WORK?