/lit/ - Literature

>>6775374
Yes, but what if we could? What if it was possible to have a sustainable, self-sufficient, safe, happy existence where children are taught to like certain things specifically so that they can spend their lives doing exactly what they want, for 7 billion people? What if it were possible? It would take thousands of years and three to five hundred years. I believe strongly in the system as it exists. That's why it's so exciting to think that we can do even better.
>>6775401
How? I'm giving it to you. I hereby nominate and, by the powers vested in me as an archpope of the Erisian mysteries, I nominate you head and unopposed dictator-for-life of the entire globbing universe. How do you solve all the problems you just listed? What is your solution to mankind's woes?
>think of reasons your own utopian ideal won't work
Exactly! If there's anything wrong with it, I want to know! I want to believe only in things that are factually correct. If there's something I should change, I want to change it, but for beliefs I can get behind the idea of a less painful world is one I believe in. Could you please tell me one?
>missed the point of the last
Key points in your argument depend on whether I can understand the poignant, esoteric, unique interpretation of a landscape shot of the lovely and talented FLCL universe. I'll listen to reason, but you could at least make an argument instead of 2deep4u
>>6775401
wait, so
>>6772035
this isn't you? Have I been talking to the wrong person? I'm sorry for being out of place, of course I would assume nothing of you. I'd guess you're smart. Smart enough to get the point across.