/lit/ - Literature

Is there a philosopher that either supports or is against my beliefs?
>There isn't an objective morality, but one should still try to be beneficial to the world using his logic to determine what the appropriate response is to a situation, with aim to minimize pain and maximize happiness, even though these concepts are both up for interpretation
>There is a God but no book properly shows his message
>There is a God and still no objective morality
>One has control over what they decide to experience, as long as they take up the job of constantly observing and managing their thoughts. They can't Will the world into whatever they wish, but they CAN control what they themselves feel and think, which is the entirety of their perception of reality

>>13385256
Oh come on it's good. It's not worth anymore then a skim read but it's solid. Also, it's recommended for beginners because it's a very entry level work. Yes, you can skip it but it's good background for the real meat of the illiad, the odysee, the histories and plato and aristotle.

I'm starting to think humans never actually understand one another. Every sentence shared gets put through the perception grinder. At it's destination, it represents something different.

Also, I feel detached from reality. It's wonderful, but unrealistic. The fact I'm here freaks me out. It's like a waking dream.

Books for these lines of thought.