/lit/ - Literature

>>4504965
It is all explained in pic related.

Philosophy died together with arts in the 19th century. Science and math made philosophy obsolete. Everything having a basis in reality is now topic of science. All that's left to philosophy is kindergarten tier metaphysics like "muh solipsism, muh consciousness".

>>4471044
>EPISTEMOLOGY IS HOW WE COME TO KNOW ABOUT METAPHYSICS

There is no objective knowledge in philosophy. All of metaphysics boils down to "I choose to believe the fairy tale which most appeals to me". Metaphysics is untestable and pointless pseudo-intellectualism, an infantile waste of time.

There are no debates in the philosophy of science. Science works and no anti-intellectual interjection by philosophers will change this. Questioning the validity of the scientific method makes you just as bad as creationists.

Philosophy has no point anymore. Philosophy died in the 19th century together with art. The formalization of logic by math and the invention of the scientific method made philosophy obsolete and useless.

>wants to write a PhD thesis in the style of a middle school essay
>doesn't even know anything about the topic
>is too stupid to find academic sources on his own

This has to be a joke thread. There is no way you're being serious. Not even liberal arts majors are that fucking retarded. Either you're "trolling" or you're trying to trick /lit/ into doing your 6th grade homework.

Philosophy became obsolete in the 19th century. The formalization of logic by math and the invention of the scientific method killed philosophy. All that's left to philosophers is unscientific retard epistemology ("How can we know anything if our brains aren't real?") and kindergarten tier metaphysics ("What if the reality of solipsism is a qualia?").

Philosophy and art died in the 19th century. Fucking deal with it. The only anti-intellectual here are you because with your kindergarten tier escapism and denial of reality you are a waste of resources.

Science and math made philosophy obsolete.

It's all summarized in this pic.

Because science works.

Why is philosophy so anti-scientific? Seriously, nobody cares about your teenaged babble regarding ethics, death or the meaning of life. All these issue have been settled by biology, psychology and economics. Learn to science and stop being pseudo-intellectual.

With the invention of the scientific method philosophy became obsolete. Everything that was considered philosophy has been formalized by science and math in the 19th century. Logic is a field of math and not understood by philosotards anymore. Aesthetics is objectively being researched without "muh feelings" bullshittery. Political science has been formalized. Epistemology has been sovled by the scientific method which produces objective truth. All that's left to philosotards is meaningless metaphysics, endlessly creating empty talk about meaningless "muh qualia" and "muh solipsism" nonsense.

inb4 ethics
Ethics is solved by common sense. We don't need a pseudo-intellectual philosofag in order to realize that murder is wrong.

How does /lit/ feel about this picture? Is this the real representation of philosophy, and is science truly superior?

Philosophy is dead. It died with the invention of the scientific method.

>>4190000
>>4190088
Do you think actually believe "contributing to philosophy" would be hard? Any toddler who barely learned to speak can make contributions to philosophy. Philosophy is nothing empty talk about metaphysics and since it cannot be tested and has no basis in reality, you can say anything you want and label it "philosophy".

>>4178806

>>4129856
In this context "religion" encompasses philosophy insofar as they are both deeply anti-intellectual and anti-science.

/thread

/sci/ here. We're having trouble agreeing on the literary genre of pic related.

Is it a caricature or a comic?

Do philosofags actually believe a quote is a valid argument? Let me laugh even harder.

Science and philosophy are mutually exclusive and incompatible.

>>3853485