[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.13291114 [View]
File: 52 KB, 616x768, 1551600863945.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13291114

>Tfw pirate all my books on my large harddrive next to my porn collection

Capitalists and Librarians btfo

>> No.13112606 [View]
File: 52 KB, 616x768, 1551600863945.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13112606

>>13108607
Roko's Basilisk rests on a stack of several other not at all robust propositions.

The core claim is that a hypothetical, but inevitable, singular ultimate superintelligence may punish those who fail to help it or help create it.

Why would it do this? Because — the theory goes — one of its objectives would be to prevent existential risk — but it could do that most effectively not merely by preventing existential risk in its present, but by also "reaching back" into its past to punish people who weren't MIRI-style effective altruists.

Thus this is not necessarily a straightforward "serve the AI or you will go to hell" — the AI and the person punished need have no causal interaction, and the punished individual may have died decades or centuries earlier. Instead, the AI could punish a simulation of the person, which it would construct by deduction from first principles. However, to do this accurately would require it be able to gather an incredible amount of data, which would no longer exist, and could not be reconstructed without reversing entropy.

Technically, the punishment is only theorised to be applied to those who knew the importance of the task in advance but did not help sufficiently. In this respect, merely knowing about the Basilisk — e.g., reading this article — opens you up to hypothetical punishment from the hypothetical superintelligence.

>Hehe, guess you will all be punished by AI now

>> No.13093008 [View]
File: 52 KB, 616x768, 1551600863945.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13093008

>Read Moby Dick
>Narrator says "Call me Ishmael"
>Never actually call him Ishmael, instead refer to him as "narrator"

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]