/lit/ - Literature

In the context of the modern world, there are two possible ways to publish a text. Anonym and with some name.

I
If the text is published anonym, there is virtualle no possibility to proof that the writer is the author of the text.
With the means of AI, even the attempt the recognition the author via language analysis isn't a sounding way anymore as some artifical intelligence could have faked the style of writing or dize the manners of the orginal author.
In this case, the critic's only chance is to work with the text at hand and to address the propositional content of the arguments properly. The author, on the other hand, could just write a anti-critique against his critic, even if neither the critic itself nor the auditory has the possibility to proof whether the writer of the answer is the writer of the orginal piece or not.

The author do not have the chance to change or edit his text himself, too.
As the message was anonym, no one could guaranteed that some internet user is the orginal author.

The good side is the chance of a cultur of more factual discussion, without the bad custome of judging a text by his or her author.