/lit/ - Literature

>>7880944
Considering Engels descrives him as being chill when the rest of the Young Hegelians were losing their shit, he'd probably be a bro.

>>7881172
No, it's "to be right someone needs to be wrong". There's no one conception which applies to everyone and if that weren't true discourse would not be possible or necessary (as per Zhuangzi).

>>7881188
Siddh was never fat, those are later representations. Before he tried the ascetic life he was pretty much a "chad", and after that he had no problem starving himself to near-death.

Taoism is more the religion you're looking to make fun of:
>The three men are dipping their fingers in a vat of vinegar and tasting it; one man reacts with a sour expression, one reacts with a bitter expression, and one reacts with a sweet expression. The three men are Confucius, Buddha, and Laozi, respectively. Each man's expression represents the predominant attitude of his philosophy: Confucianism saw life as sour, in need of rules to correct the degeneration of people; Buddhism saw life as bitter, dominated by pain and suffering; and Taoism saw life as fundamentally good in its natural state.

>you like living = Taoism
>you are indifferent to living = Confucianism
>you dislike living = Buddhism