/lit/ - Literature

Honest thoughts on this 2006 masterpiece?

>>20568413
>impossible to refute

Starting with an obvious one.

i had a hardcore new atheist period as a teen and that combined with the hard right turn of 90% of the big new atheist figures kind of led to me not really considering my atheism as an animating thing in my politics but the escalation of anti-trans laws and this roe v. wade thing have basically made me realize that this is wrong and that christianity at the very least needs to be destroyed. what's the hot new shit in this sphere, is it even still around?

What is the best book to "understand" atheism? I'm not interested in converting, being talked down to, or blamed for the crimes people committed 500+ years ago.

Is this really the atheist Bible or is there a better work of atheist philosophy to read to understand the religion? Yes, atheism is functionally a religion.

>>16293589

Started reading this, was really hoping it would present me with some serious questions and serious arguements against religeon. I'm trying to keep an open mind, I almost want it to change my worldview but it doesn't really seem like Dawkins is saying much, just a lot of intuellectual prose and some examples, but nothing really groundbreaking.

Any other books about atheism that argue against religeon or the existance of god? Anything more convincing than this? Like I said, I'm really trying to keep an open mind and have my worldview changed but the arguments I'm finding against religeon and the existance of god seem to me to be just as weak as the arguments for religeon and the existance of god.

>>14974730
easy