/lit/ - Literature

>>13455589
>Real spiritual traditions don't lead to much insight either. Try talking to a random pleb

>>13085256
You hold on to that. Values are valuable.
https://youtu.be/omnskeu-puE

>>13013615
>So do the kids who write long essays discussing the nature of the force in star wars
I'm not dissing Star Wars. Disney and Hollywood, however, are Freudian and not scholarly, nor intuitive. As opposed by the Jungian/Campbellian Star Wars of before. You shouldn't underestimate Star Wars just because it's popular, in fact, it was popular all over the planet, meaning that any spiritual practice could find it a helpful story. Not anymore, and I fully agree with official Vatican refutation of Force Awakens.
>The muslims had more to do with that
They haven't had anything to do with that for 800 years for now. I'm not dissing other intellectual traditions either. Plus, they don't exactly venerate Logos or tinitarian understanding of marriage. Though their love for divine traps means that they, too, are onto something.

Living within a subverted social experiment for rats is not fit for man. This is obvious to all men. However, the modern age breeds a distinct animal. Ugliness is evil. The modern age is not scholarly, it's not intellectual and it's not intuitive. It's just banal and evil.

>>12980337
So you reject what you consider major flaws of modernity but you embrace modern notions of racial egalitarianism? How does that work?

Any good books on achieving altered states of consciousness through breathing, meditation or yoga?

>>12948589
>of importance.
Clarify.