/lit/ - Literature

>>11018894
>This entire pathetic philosophy with its groundings in baseless emotional attachment
what aspects are grounded in "baseless emotional attachment"? I do not think you comprehend the basis of the National Socialist philosophy and worldview if you think that it is rooted in emotional attachment.
>hence a nationalist party, which does contradict the man
How does being a nationalist contradict Schopenhauer, who was criticizing national pride? Can one not be a nationalist, and as such recognize the benefits of working together with those who speak your language, occupy land which you have access to, and share a common purpose, while not necessarily considering your nation to be superior due to any inherent qualities other than the values which it expresses?