/lit/ - Literature

>>13721240
>>13721233
Humanity sucks and should go extinct. I hate mankind, chimps, and bonobos. You all suck.

inb4 someone posts a cap of it, I already have it on one tab anyway.


>>Because to me there is "something" over and above mere naturalist explanations that makes human beings reprehensible. "Something" that is inherent in the functioning of their minds that makes them aligned with a kind of Demiurge. In this sense, seeking to annihilate mankind as a whole is the greatest of good. The issue is though, as a nihilist, one cannot definitively call mankind "bad"; it merely becomes preferential since one dismisses all possibility of intentionality in the overall cosmos. In other words, a true misanthrope is like a Gnostic variant of Ulrich Horstmann, which is exactly what I am. The truth is, I am not exactly a human. Convicted antinatalists go beyond humanity in many respects to something more divine.
Mankind will ultimately destroy itself eventually, but I want to be on the mountain summit laughing while I see them devour on another. Perhaps, I will join in, crushing their skulls here and there, and lynching the hypocritical humanist scum. What a shame I was not a happy bird or whale! Oh well, one day I will show man my pain, a pain that transcends this world, our bloody faces meeting.

>>13675448
Because to me there is "something" over and above mere naturalist explanations that makes human beings reprehensible. "Something" that is inherent in the functioning of their minds that makes them aligned with a kind of Demiurge. In this sense, seeking to annihilate mankind as a whole is the greatest of good. The issue is though, as a nihilist, one cannot definitively call mankind "bad"; it merely becomes preferential since one dismisses all possibility of intentionality in the overall cosmos. In other words, a true misanthrope is like a Gnostic variant of Ulrich Horstmann, which is exactly what I am. The truth is, I am not exactly a human. Convicted antinatalists go beyond humanity in many respects to something more divine.
Mankind will ultimately destroy itself eventually, but I want to be on the mountain summit laughing while I see them devour on another. Perhaps, I will join in, crushing their skulls here and there, and lynching the hypocritical humanist scum. What a shame I was not a happy bird or whale! Oh well, one day I will show man my pain, a pain that transcends this world, our bloody faces meeting.

I need some non-fiction books (also fiction if they're really realistic about it) about the state of the world in the near future (2025-2100); what is expected to happen, what will be in trend, what technology we can expect, what will be the next big crisis? Will China become the 1# superpower?


>inb4 Yuval Noah Harari

>>13367531
Those who believe there can be no relative peace are the ones that need to die. You are depraved motherfuckers and have to leave this world. Of course, this includes most of mankind. Perhaps, another species will evolve and take their rightful place as the inheritors of Earth. Mankind is a wretched species, and I see all of the depravity and vulgarness of mankind in your shitty posts. Genuinely slit your throat.

>>13348909
What you say is true, but I don't see a solution outside of antinatalism. And to be fair, I don't think most time periods in the past were that great either. It seems to be a problem with humanity as a whole in my view. People in the past had different sorts of problems. I do not think the solution is to become a right-wing tard who supports ethnic cleansing and "an accelerationist reset" either.

>>13342874
The number of rapists tend to increase during times of war or invasion. So you know, it's not a smart idea to help destabilize another country and then open your borders to them.

>>13284883
This. Schopenhauer was not a sadist the way Marquis de Sade was. To make this point, Schopenhauer would look at this image with great grief and encourage compassion and ascetism instead. However, Maquis de Sade would jerk off to this image and say he wants more.

I, myself, am more like a dualistic Schopenhauer. I am not really a monist, but I do agree with the ascetic and even antinatalist sensibilities of Schopenhauer.

>>13243801
>>13243779
Whenever I have sex, I can feel something like a Demiurge's "pull", and I do not feel that this is my body. I can feel the murmurings of demons whispering in my ears, and there is like a background of red. The will, the impulse, that pushes me towards sexual gratification is not mine, it is something else. It offends me, especially those who fetishize it.