/lit/ - Literature

>>20490406
>>20490427
"Degeneracy" and "egalitarianism" really aren't very big words. They should definitely be in every mid-wits vocabulary (i.e. if you're reasonably intelligent, he shouldn't looks smart to you for simply using those words).
>>20490427
Is that really Taiwan? His point would make a lot more sense if it were Hong Kong honestly.

>>20484595
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7G2YAtFeVOM

"Then I guess the human race will go extinct," she huffed, as the last woman in the world stormed away from me, the only surviving male.

Well, this settles it once and for all. There is no God. Which turns out to be a good thing, considering the God most Americans believe in is a crazy, vengeful, ego-maniacal monster. Dawkins’ insights are so cunning and profound you can’t help feeling embarrassed for the believer.

Some of the main arguments:
Believer #1: The diversity of life is too complex to be random, so it must have been designed by someone even more complex.
Dawkins: If the designer is so complex, then it must’ve been created by someone even more complex. And on and on like that. In philosophical terms it’s an infinite regress. In simpler terms it’s: “So who made God?“ The only plausible explanation for the complexity of life on Earth is natural selection.

Believer #2: The chances of having all the right conditions to develop life are so miniscule, it had to be done on purpose.
Dawkins: It’s true the odds are probably about a billion to one. But there are potentially a billion billion planets in the universe. I’m not very good at math, but that definitely improves the likelihood. And we know it happened here, so it could definitely happen again.

Believer #3: Without God to teach us, we wouldn’t know good from evil.
Dawkins: People all over the world make the same moral decisions in thought experiments, regardless of vast religious differences. We do not need God to teach us good and evil. Not only that, no person in modern times can seriously claim they are basing their behavior on Biblical guidelines. We’re talking about people who were ready to kill their own kids, or at least offer up their virgin daughter to be gang raped. In the example of Lot, God only spares Lot and his daughters, because they are the most righteous people in town. Then the two daughters proceed to get him liquored up and seduce him. Which begs the question, wouldn’t God have seen that coming?

>>16399370
>>16399889
>>16399896

>>15023455
can i have sex with them or not?

>>11647082

>>6515362
>>6515362
>>tfw everything you write is preachy and banal
>Checking comments
>Anon seems like he's trying to emulate writing styles from other authors

>implying I interact with real human beans

Let's not have an argument g-guys

>>6023306
You must have full frog and behind seven lilliproxies

Do not take on an anxious anxiety this will affect ur working status quality

>>5078481
>wonder what my zodiac sign is
>type birthday into thing from google
>VIRGO - THE VIRGIN

fucking stars

>mfw the red box thread is the worst of all box threads