/lit/ - Literature

>>13415016
Most women I've met that have either been diagnosed or showed all the symptoms of BPD were all victims of abuse, usually sexual. People with a history of being abused have a tendency to develop split-mind disorders, which, in my opinion, are more or less impossible to teat without the use of hypnotic regression or other similar methods, but even then it's not a foolproof method.
Past history of abuse or trauma (usually at a young age or vital stage of puberty) with the addition of media, progressed sugars, sedentary lifestyle, lack of worthwhile education, no sense of personal independence, ect, all could exacerbate this condition, and potentially even lead to an eventual comorbid condition.
Most of the time, they'll use their diagnosis (or simply self-diagnose) as an excuse for their abnormal or all-out evil behavior, and they are impossible to be with over long periods of time.
>Does (it) change philosophy and theology?
I don't think so. It may add to it, but not completely change it. The idea that I've come to believe is worthwhile to ponder in this case is that evil begets evil. Remember that most of these people are themselves the victims of past abuse, and that if that abuse occurred in adolescence they may not even be mentally capable of remembering it. For those that have not been victimized, the ones that are merely an anomaly, I wonder if they'd have turned out that way if they'd have been born into another society, another geographic location, another climate, ect. In that I doubt we'll ever know.
I've known about 5 women with this type of or similar mental condition, and I've had relationships with 4 of them. OP, if you're any way in a relationship with one of these types, proceed with caution and do as much research as possible. And know what feedback they're looking for when they do preposterous stunts to get your full attention.

Harry Potter was a ghostwritten piece. It was not, could not, have been written by a single mother, fighting against adversity, writing her brilliant insights onto a napkin in a fucking coffee house.
Consider the following evidence in support of this theory:
>Many famous texts throughout history have been ghostwritten by literary societies and attributed to everyman (or woman) individuals to increase public interest
>Many of the characters in the book heed reference to established astrological symbolism, such as Sirius Black, an animagus whos animal for is a black dog, in reference to Sirrius, the brightest star in the night sky, known as the Dog Star.
>References to established historical figures related to the field of magic and the occult, such as Nicolas Flamel the famous alchemist.
>Colorful retelling of the ancient tale of Osiris and Isis.
>Osiris is murdered by Set (aka Typhon, the serpent), and Isis must give birth to her son, Horus in secret
>Horus (the hawk), achieving manhood, overthrows the tyrannical Set (the serpent)
>James Potter is murdered by Voldemort
>Harry, achieving manhood, overthrows Voldemort
>Voldemort's horcrux, Nagini is a giant serpent
<Nagini is a Vedic term referring to a female Naga, a serpent demon
>Harry is of the house of Gryphondoor, the Gryphon
The list goes on and on and the symbology is saturated throughout the book. Only a person with a knowledge of occult symbolism (namely Masonic) and comparative mythology (such as Joseph Campbell) would have been able to write such a story. "Author" JK Rowling does not fit this description.