/lit/ - Literature

>>22305811
>We can just eat the plants to get the energy: Crisis averted.
How does digesting food prove your ancestors were fish?

>entropy’s no issue.
Hereditary mutations say otherwise, but whatever laws of science you have to suspend to preserve your fantasy.

>How exactly? People who get detrimental mutations will simply have fewer children than those who don’t.
Keep thinking, anon, I know you can do it. What happens to their offspring? and their offspring? and their offspring? If everyone's more mutant than the last generation, what happens in the end?

>What is a kind?
Evolutionists sometimes refer to the change of kind as "macroevolution". They claim adaptations are "microevolution" and then claim that proves "macroevolution" if you just believe that enough time will account for it, if you just believe, if you just believe time can make it happen, just have belief that enough time will make "microevolution" into "macroevolution" because they both have "evolution" in the name. But I'm sure you'll start complaining about those words too, right? just because they weren't part of your specific indoctrination to believe your ancestors were fish and that you share a common ancestry with maggots and that any of that is based in reality or science.

>>22305829
Your religion is tax funded and taught as "settled science™ fact" in schools, mine is not.