[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.2551988 [View]
File: 28 KB, 320x450, slaughterhouse-five.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2551988

/mu/tant here. What are the top 5 best books by Kurt Vonnegut and who are some other authors that write like him? Thanks.

>> No.1604903 [View]
File: 28 KB, 320x450, slaughterhouse-five.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1604903

How do you feel about Slaughterhouse 5, /lit/?

I thought its ending was abrupt and unsatisfying.

>> No.1522022 [View]
File: 28 KB, 320x450, slaughterhouse-five[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1522022

Which Vonnegut book would you recommend someone after they've finished with Slaughter-House Five?

>> No.618776 [View]
File: 28 KB, 320x450, slaughterhouse-five.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
618776

>Slaughterhouse-Five is one of those rare sorts of books whose total lack of any merit whatsoever is inexplicable in the face of its generally agreed upon status as a world classic.

Had this fatalistic, dewy-eyed tripe not been written during the escalation of 'Nam and the sudden moral ambiguity pervading American letters at the time, it would, honestly, never have made it close.

This is sad. The literati have doubtless showered numerous accolades at its feet, though what, for instance, is there to celebrate in this pure dreck?

Vonnegut's cheap cynicism? The novel itself, when not drowning in a sea of depression and cathartic murkiness, hardly makes a joke worth mentioning that doesn't revile the establishment, turn the hardship of soldiers into a complete and utter disgrace, revile all war, and then have the sheer scholastic arrogance to proclaim once and for all, as though this distorted face were really truth. Yes, as a 'satire', it fails completely.

So we come down to technique. The structure of the novel is mildly interesting, and the minimalism flows well. The writing is fairly clear and potentially charged; if only the subject matter had been improved upon, than perhaps the author could have gotten away with the awards. As such, this is hardly the case.

In short, it's nothing groundbreaking. And moreover it is dangerous. Not to mention very worthless. Had it been a great absurdist parable like Catch 22 (which, though also wrong, has strong artistic license, and will likely stand the ages) than I would have rather different sentiments.

>> No.589355 [View]
File: 28 KB, 320x450, slaughterhousefive.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
589355

What is your Catcher in the Rye, /lit/?

If you don't know what that means, I mean that one book you can read a thousand times and you keep with you often (beside your bed or something).

Pic related. I could read it cover to cover back to back for years and not get sick of it.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]