[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.19029952 [View]
File: 194 KB, 720x480, FC6A748F-4E57-4471-A9B4-EA4778C51314.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19029952

>>19029893
Homeric hymns
Emperor Julian’s writing
Just any of the mythologies you like. Graves’ Greek Myths lists all the sources in the bibliography for that culture

>> No.17131964 [View]
File: 194 KB, 720x480, 92718020-B768-48CE-9E0B-EFB142D507DA.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17131964

>>17130731
Okay. This is framed to ask what would a grouping of ancom communities do to make a preemptive attack on some place. “New information” or whatever. On its face it sounds just fucked up and I’d rather not hammer it into some scenario. So lets start from the beginning.
As we are now we need to organize. Though I want a peaceful transition and we should do everything we can to save lives, in the long run we may act too slowly and actually allow enough time for complete extinction. So we have to also prepare ourselves militarily. Like the Kurds we should have full training of just about everyone. Defense of our homes and loved ones and support for our neighboring communities. The enemies are the state and their nationalist (statist) dogs. Once this phase passes, what kind of world is left? Ideologically there can be some debates in many corners of the world on how to carry on, but the main principles everyone ought to agree on may just be written in stone as: Leave each other alone. And: Mend the environment. Basically.
An organized world is decentralized. Some pockets of reactionaries may do something stupid here and there, but peace treaties and counter-bullying strikes may be needed. I really doubt these will ever become full scale “wars”. The new way people would govern themselves just wouldn’t allow it. In fact they’d act to counter any future outbreaks of antagonism, large or small.
How they go about an offensive, say against a crazy cult leader maybe, would indeed have to be considered. And the more people attending the meetings for such an action, voicing their opinions, the better.
So yes.

>>17131433
I personally don’t care, but find it really inverted logic. Pussy is tougher than scrotums. It’s just true.

>> No.14700740 [View]
File: 194 KB, 720x480, Maenads in a Wood - angle 1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14700740

You upset the spirits by not jerking it.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]