/lit/ - Literature

>>22171738
>starts thread asking which book he should read next
>is told what to read
>reads something else

based

>open Word
>*click clack click clack click*
>"Every story has a beginning and this is David Wallace's."
>Whew, that's good stuff. Time for a well earned break.

>>20851715
>>20851802
(you)s for anons with functioning brains

A discussion on whether a god of some kind exists is a valid one.
A discussion whether the Abramic god (Yahweh) exists is a joke.

Thread can stop now.

>>20370339
Pretty good but too much old shit.

-Aeneid
-Augustine
-Canterbury Tales
-Paradise Lost

+sth by Locke (more important than Hobbes)
+sth by Pushkin (greatest writer of the biggest European language)
+Moby Dick or Leaves of Grass (the most important American works pre 20th century)
+sth much more modern, for ex. DFW or Pelevin. I'm not sure what but something about technological and modernist alienation.

Additional candidates for removal
*-Aristotle
*-Faust

>>20338829

>e.g means e-gzample
>i.e means in this example

>>19328947
>The utter meaningless of existence is most obvious when you're not consumed by familial and work responsibilities. I hope I get pancreatic cancer asap so I can be dead in a few months. This shit is pointless and doesn't make any sense.

>>19234845
I work for the public library and we don't take donations.

>>19141440
>I don't care but I downloaded the pdf anyway

>>19003617
Thanks based /fitlit/ bro.

>>18892152
Line limit. Maybe next time.

>>18333830
Didn't read. Kill yourself tradlarper.

>link related is still unrefuted.

https://slatestarcodex.com/2013/10/20/the-anti-reactionary-faq/
Did Scott Alexander successfully refuted reactionaries and NRxtards?