/lit/ - Literature

>Hudson's premise isn't even especially difficult to grasp, I think I can sum it up for the people who are confused.

>Marx believed that industrial capitalism would continue to free itself from the rentier class and rid itself of the legacy of feudalism, and that industrial capitalism, as it continued to develop, would itself create the conditions for socialism to exist. Except that never happened, instead what happened is that the rentier class latched onto industrial capitalism like a parasite and is actively dismantling it. Rather than progressing forward in history towards socialism, we are regressing back towards feudalism. Cancelling the debt is incredibly important, because not only does it free the poor from debt-slavery, but it also destroys the imperial power of the rentier class at the same time. If you want to weaken capitalist imperialism, you MUST attack the finance capital, and failure to do so will result in the rentier class gaining so much power that we actively regress back towards feudalism rather than industrialization leading forwards towards socialism.

Even Marxists have come to the conclusion that's its the Jews unironically. What does this mean for Marxism bros? No more brother wars?