/lit/ - Literature

>>13655449
>they're shilling hard for translations with a protestant/reformed bias
That poster asked a question about the differences between the Geneva and King James Bibles so I answered his question, when he asked which would be closer to the source material I offered the NASB as a modern example and said to read all of them and why. What you're doing is recommending a modern translation approved by your church with commentary from your church and calling it unbiased. The KJV remains widely popular in America and Christians should be familiar with it, and the differences between it and our modern translations are not nearly so many that you should be able to call it "absolute dogshit" while calling yourself a faithful Christian. We should be thankful that we've been provided older, clearer, etc. manuscripts in recent times, but (hundreds of thousands? millions? of) people worshiped for hundreds of years using the KJV and they knew God, do you?

And you do realize that your NABRE's and NRSVCE's use nearly the same source material as my NASB, right? We're all reading Nestle-Aland now, Papist.

>>12489299
>be me, potter
>shape Earthen vessels for various purposes
>throw some in the trash
>

>>12083238
>Yemenese