/lit/ - Literature

>>15838904
>are around 15%
So you admit you were wrong, alright.
>top military commanders and proponents of the deep operation doctrine
The big brain behind deep battle survived, he was bullied for being a jew, but he survived. Trifiandilov died in an accident. Tukhachevski was a mediocre general and too offense-minded (even as a person).
>effectively rendering the military useless when it was most needed.
RKKA suffered because Stalin did not anticipate the offensive and because Wehrmacht was the most powerful and tactically advanced army in the world, it fucking raped France in less than a month. Few people expected Russia to withstand Nazi onslaught. Also the big problem of Russian military was the lack of competent under-officers which plagues the military to this day.
>as long as the leadership doesn't care or want that that food will end to the table of the people
Guess what retard, the problem during the famine was production not allocation. Leadership over-prioritized industry so agriculture suffered. In the long run however it was fixed and Russians first time in history enjoyed food security. You are so fucking clueless...
>That doesn't invalidate her account.
Her account did not had any relevance to begin with. No one cares about anecdotes from some mail order bride.
>Guess what led that to happen?
Traitorous leadership, Khrushchov´s denouncement of Stalin, Afghan, under-estimation of solid state electronics, national problems etc.
>What statistics?
The ones on the topic obviously. Opinion polling on how do people view Soviet regime.
>If communism hadn't happened, your dreaded transition wouldn't have happened.
How many times do I have to tell you that we don´t have a single fucking clue on what could have happened without communism you fucking retard? That´s completely speculative alt-history. Russians might have as well been completely genocided considering how badly did industrial development under Tsarist regime (picrel).