[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.2039315 [SPOILER]  [View]
File: 604 KB, 702x599, bcfa5d90c508e328a920ba1d8f47243d.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends is amazingly creative. Also poni poni poni poni poni poni poni

>> No.1989468 [View]
File: 604 KB, 702x599, bcfa5d90c508e328a920ba1d8f47243d.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1989468

Don't take yourself too seriously, OP. Just say thank you for the gift and move on. If and when you're a parent someday, you'll understand.

>> No.1912643 [View]
File: 604 KB, 702x599, bcfa5d90c508e328a920ba1d8f47243d.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1912643

>>1911307
I guess we're kind of arguing in circles here, but it's worth noting certain things.
1. You argue that there is only one logic, though we Anons have demonstrated that there are indeed different forms of logic, different ways of knowing and understanding the world.
2. Even though you claim that there is only one type of logic, you refuse to even give a cursory definition of this logic. From what I can gather from your disparate statements, this logic A) is hierarchical and that B) at the top of this hierarchy is science. (Though science being at the top of a hierarchy of logics, when there is only one type of logic doesn't seem to make any sense to me, but maybe I'm just not being logical here).
3. Judging from these criteria, I assume that your "logic" is some manner of empiricism. Yet, I have demonstrated that empiricism (that is what is strictly observable) is not the only way of knowing the world. There is also abstract, mathematical logic. And no, mathematical logic and empiricism are not identical, for there are things in mathematical logic that are not observable in the natural world (e.g. infinite series [since infinity does not exist in a finite world] or imaginary numbers [I've never seen a negative 2 in nature]).

>> No.1871752 [SPOILER]  [View]
File: 604 KB, 702x599, bcfa5d90c508e328a920ba1d8f47243d.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1871752

/co/ -- All the Pretty Horses by Cormac McCarthy

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]