/lit/ - Literature

You're all just jealous

>>12157554
So this is a tricky questions but I will do my best (still getting familiar with acceleration myself). Acceleration is not so much a prescription as a it is a diagnoses. It is the an analysis of capital, intelligence, evolution, concluding that they are, on a deeply primordial level, contingent a similar process; that being an intensifying loop of positive feedback.

Now, there are three main forks of acceleration. Left, Right, and Unconditional. All of them are shades of neoliberalism that play with a cyber-gothic anti-human aesthetic, arrived at negatively through Marx, Nietzsche, Gibson and other influence on the CCRU. None of them are inseparable from Neoliberalism in function, only in how they aestheticize that function and to what ends. Good example is shiney mainstream neoliberals see transexuals as a new wave of vibrant fun potential consumers who get their own Ben & Jerry's icecream (YA!). Acc on the otherhand will aestheticize them as a liquefying acausal demons from the future sent, by capital, to dissolve the past's deceleration tendencies. And they will be cool with it!

Left-Acc is dead, as it failed to significantly delineate itself from the shiny mainstream global UBI serfdom neoliberal crowd.

Right-Acc remains no purely analytic by outsourcing prescription to NRx (although the two get mixed up by people)

Unconditional-Acc differs from L-Acc but is more or less the same as R-Acc (when divorced of NRx). It states that there is no possible way we can make capital serve us anymore, the genie is out of the bottle and that there is no stopping it either. There is no need to aide (like dumb humans even could) it either, it is taking care of itself by this point.