[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.14433731 [View]
File: 17 KB, 526x268, 99132547-9233-4747-9D02-53A2CF31F088.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14433731

>>14427313
this is how retarded you sound

>> No.14290691 [View]
File: 17 KB, 526x268, C0A66647-7166-4B8B-BDB2-F01B7A56BBF5.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14290691

>>14287517
>supposedly has 130 IQ
>cannot interpret a simple normal distribution
whatever brainlet

>> No.13600596 [View]
File: 17 KB, 526x268, BE70F306-2C99-4CE7-BDE1-0F09D0F4AC5D.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13600596

>>13600460
>muh anecdote disproves your dataset of tens of thousands of people
your post is pic-related and absolutely retarded cope. don’t reproduce

>> No.11309512 [View]
File: 17 KB, 526x268, statisticallyilliterate.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11309512

>>11309177
pic related but flip it horizontally

leftists never seem to understand anecdotal evidence versus statistics

>> No.11299066 [View]
File: 17 KB, 526x268, statisticallyilliterate.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11299066

>>11298969
That's funny. Whenever I argue for race realism on this board, it's always me, Mr. Reactionary, providing numerous citations of studies, statistics, books, etc., on the subject. On the opposing side, it's the leftists who usually argue with anecdotal evidence, ad hominem, and maybe a blog post or an article from a rag of a newspaper. Very rarely do I encounter people willing to have a fair debate with clear objectives, useful framing, and a willingness to stick to the topic and examine the evidence and let the chips fall as they may. Probably because they know that 1) their entire egalitarian ideology is at stake; 2) they know that even giving an inch of ground to the hereditarians means that they lose; and 3) they know that they will lose for certain if they engage in good faith.

I used to be left-leaning myself, and I still have a lot of sympathy for leftists in my heart, but the persistent refusal to acknowledge race realism and devise solutions to social problems influenced by human biodiversity has permanently inoculated me from supporting any left-wing movement. Chomsky and Adorno are still comfy reads though.

>> No.11293211 [View]
File: 17 KB, 526x268, statisticallyilliterate.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11293211

>>11293200
>my anecdotal experience beats your statistical evidence!!!
>ignore the fact that the amount of whites with 2250+ SAT scores is at least 3-4x the amount of Jews with 2250+ SAT scores, so Jews should NEVER be outnumbering non-Jewish whites at top universities
Come on, this is basic statistical literacy at this point. Admissions is a zero-sum game. The difference between academic merit and enrollment is so great that it is obvious that Jews were picked over non-Jews despite having equal (or perhaps lesser) merit.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]