/lit/ - Literature

>>15913289
Well one thing to keep in mind is that Deleuze wasn't really a postmodernist in terms of content. You could make the case that he is one in terms of style (since he has the same difficult style specific for that era), but people mostly conflate poststructuralism with postmodernism which is why he gets lumped in with the rest of them. But he's basically described himself as the most naive philosopher of his generation, a classical metaphysician, an empiricist, a vitalist, a Marxist, a pragmatist and a few other things (in various stages of his work and referring to specific things, to be fair).

>>14762970
He never said that. He explicitly said that it's all about fisting wolves at midnight.