/lit/ - Literature

i wanna start reading hegel , but dont know where to start, any charts or tips?

Redpill me on pic related.

Why did Hegel, Gibbon, and really, most of the european intelligentsia until like 50 years ago have a massive hateboner for Byzantium and everything byzantine? Without them like 90% of the Greek literature we possess today would have been lost, at least that should amount to something, right?

Why did the figures of the Enlightenment have such a massive, implacable hateboner for everything concerning the Byzantines? Especially since like 95% of everything from the Greeks came down to us through byzantine manuscripts and byzantine emigrant scholars, how were they not hailed as the heroes who safeguarded Greek learning through a very difficult period in history?

>The consciousness knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is (whichever is greater), it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the consciousness from a position where it is to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position that it was, is now the position that it isn't. In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a variation, the variation being the difference between where the consciousness is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the consciousness must also know where it was. The consciousness guidance computer scenario works as follows: Because a variation has modified some of the information the consciousness has obtained, it is not sure just where it is. However, it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it wasn't, or vice-versa, and by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be, and where it was, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called negation of the negation.

Dude, why do you think Husserl and Hegel have the same eyes? They too saw what Douglas Hofstader and Eric Steinhart and even LEIBNIZ saw.

Husserl and Hegel rediscovered neoplatonic meditation methods independently or co-independently with reading platonic and hermetic texts. They then resold it using less pretentious terminology.

Hofstader and steinhart are just boomer weekend warrior faggots like /lit/ so after 40 years of half-assed study they got a vague hint of truth and produced works like the yt video in post >>14750053
and GEB

>>14748720
>I recently read Das Kapital with great interest, pouring time and effort into it
It felt eerily similar to our situation today, I really felt like Marx hit the nail on the head when describing Jewish influence and Industrialism.

Is he really that difficult? Where should one start with Hegel?

What the F*CK was his problem?!?

What the fuck is this dude going on about?

>>10986836
/thread

What was he trying to extrapolate?

*blocks your path*
*blocks your other path*
*blocks your THIRD path*

Wat do? You got out of dimensions bucko