/lit/ - Literature

>>14660450
i fuckin love Brokeback Mountain
am i a girl?

>>10171864
eeehhehehehehehheheheheheheeeehehhehehhehhe

>>9433401
You're fun.

>picking up the work of Jung and tying it into modern psychology
>intellectual OC
Pick one.

>friendly reminder that this discussion is about you calling things /pol/
I haven't forgotten this, but the argument has turned into you telling me Peterson is a person worthy of discussion on this board, and me not agreeing.

>I'm not incredibly familiar with Molyneux or his work. Why don't you start a thread and we can discuss it?
You can go to /pol/ and contribute your many nuggets of wisdom to one of the frequent Molyneux threads (or Peterson threads for that matter)

>seeking things to be upset over
You're the one who got upset at me insulting your hero. A thread was started, where OP asked a question, to which I replied with an answer. Hardly seems out of the ordinary.

In reference to >>9433334
>a man who has done legitimate philosophical writing.
He wrote (one) book, borderline-plagiarizing real philosophers. I am basing that opinion off of his lecture series, under the same title, which i have watched a few installments of. If you are going to refute this point, provide me with one philosophical argument Peterson has come up with himself.

>but patreon
I called him a beggar and shekel grubber, but I never mentioned patreon. that was in reference to his "Self Authoring Suite, which he sells on twitter next pictures of frogs and references to 4chan.

>You have decided to hate Peterson because you first heard of him in the context of /pol/
I did not first hear of him in context of /pol/, he pokes his head into many different podcasts and Youtube channels has his own popular Youtube presence, which did not exist before he uploaded videos of himself hollering with college students about trannies and freedon of speech laws.

>If you don't prefer him, don't post in the thread.
The topic of this thread is not Peterson himself, but "Why are threads about this guy always deleted?" I gave a reason, which I still stand by: >>9433013

>don't act like Zizek and Land belong on /lit/ while Peterson doesn't.
I quote from the sticky:
>ideally those discussions of philosophy that take place on /lit/ should be based around specific philosophical works to which posters can refer.
So take some points from his (one) book and discuss them. But don't make general "why doesn't /lit/ like Peterson" threads.