/lit/ - Literature

I'm trying to collect as many as I can before Marxist takeover happens in America.

Now that I have your attention,
Cottrell, Jonathan M.,Newman, Daniel A.,Roisman, Glenn I (2015) determined that socioeconomic and environmental factors can widely and mostly account for achievement disparities. Most important, or at least heavily focused on in the study is maternal disadvantage, which accounts heavily for a lot of what the Bell Curve and other studies could not account for past simple socioeconomic status.

Single-parent families are on the rise in poor America, especially among minorities such as blacks and Latinos. In light of this evidence, should this be the primary vector through which to attempt to equalize the racial achievement gap? How can we get more black and Latino families to have two-parent homes in the United States?

/pol/acks need not apply

>>14260853
But I’m guessing you’ve already read it since you’re trying to abandon your ancestors’ genetics.

I used to be a leftist liberal who thought diversity was great and that we could all get along fine, but this book really opened my eyes. Society is only as good as the people in it, if you bring in low quality and low IQ people in, the whole society will degrade as a result and we're seeing that today with the most diverse places being the shittiest.
I urge every liberal here to read this.

>What's that? The entirety of my intellectual and professional life is dictated by a number which stays the same no matter what and I'm extremely likely to be in the middle and not be able to be anything more than a wage cuck for the rest of my life even if I want to? oh...

Even if I fall for le IQ meme, I still think this is a really bad book to give to young children since they'll probably get blackpilled.

>>10718570
he's referring to the book, not the concept